New South Carolina Laws to Protect Cyclists
Wed, June 11, 2008 Mark Sanford, Governor of my adopted home state of South Carolina, signed a new bill into law yesterday, clarifying that cyclists have as much right to the state's roads as motorists do.
Motorists will be required to keep a safe distance between the motor vehicle and the cyclist. As I see it, there is no three-foot passing law that other states have enacted, but I guess at least if a motorist hits a cyclist he can’t argue that he was at a safe distance.
There are provisions for fines of up to $1,000 if a cyclist is seriously injured.
It is now a misdemeanor to harass, yell at, honk at, or throw and object in the direction of a cyclist. Punishable by a $250 fine, or 30 days prison, or both.
Cyclists are required to use a bike lane where provided, but may move into the road to avoid a hazard. Cyclists are not required to use a separate multi-use bike path, and can opt to ride on the road.
A cyclist can ride on the shoulder of the road, or the road, but is not required to ride on the shoulder.
Cyclists are not allowed to ride more than two abreast on public roads, which means they can ride in twos if circumstances allow. (This has been the law in SC all along and remains the same.)
A cyclist is no longer required to have a bell on their bike. (Someone should get a no-bell prize for that one :) I guess if it is a misdemeanor to honk at a cyclist, it is only fair that cyclist should not be allowed to ring their bell in anger.
Cyclists should signal a left turn by extending their left arm straight out, and in the case of a right turn, may signal with the right arm straight out. In other words, point in the direction they intend to go.
I am pleased, as this is what I have been doing all along. It seems to make more sense than signaling a right turn with your left arm at a 90 degree angle pointing upwards.
This bill has been kicking around since 2004. Sadly, it was the deaths of two cyclists that spurred it on. The new bicycle safety legislation was signed into law yesterday, Tuesday, June 10th, 2008, the day after Rachel Giblin’s birthday and the day before Tom Hoskins’ birthday. Rachel would have been 17. Tom would have been 50. Both died in vehicle-bike crashes.
South Carolina is unfortunately seventh in the nation when it comes to cycling fatalities, a horrible record. It saddened me when my local paper, the Post & Courier, printed this story on Monday and many hateful comments from readers were posted.
It only goes to show when people can no longer discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, or sexual orientation, they can improvise and still find someone to hate.
I am not a Lance Armstrong wannabe, I was racing bikes before Lance Armsrtong’s parents were born. I just want to ride my bike and come home safely, as we all do. I have a wife and also two daughters who love me, and would miss me.
I don’t expect attitudes to change overnight, however, this is a huge step forward. Every time another state passes laws like these, it makes it a little easier for the remaining states to follow suit.
Reader Comments (23)
The complaints about cyclists delaying cars make me think- What if I was driving a heavily laden truck at the same speed (as I ride), would the impatient driver behind me harrass me, honk at me and pass me dangerously? Of course not- it is their perception that they cannot be harmed by me that pushes them to do so.
In London (where I live now), most drivers realise that you will probably pass them, and this lessens the impatient behaviour, except for the odd idiot.
Andrew
Not until laws are effectively and fairly enforced will VC be a credible and viable approach.
Jack
That is a shame. The slow erosion of the right to use the road and the rise of car users vision that the main road belongs to them.
Jack
There has also been a clause in the SC state bicycle laws about riding as close to the right side of the road as you can, safely. That leaves it up to the cyclists' discretion if there is debris/obstructions in the bike lanes. I don't know if that's changed with the new laws or not.
This is a BIG triumph for the Palmetto Cycling Coalition, the state's bicycling advocacy group. I used to be on the Board of Directors and I know how hard that group works to achieve things like this. It's just a shame that innocent lives had to be taken (again) to finally get something done about it.
Thanks again, Dave, for a great post.
EE
Drivers just do dumb thoughtless things, no matter what state they live in.
Why is it the USA and the UK that are so intolerant of cyclists? So much pointless hate.
I guess it's not part of the culture like mainland Europe (I live in France and the admittedly crazy drivers are virtually always respectful of cyclists)
Link to a photo of a nice french bike sign requiring 1.5 metres (5 feet!) between bike and car.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/willj/2533928895/
I am pleased, as this is what I have been doing all along. It seems to make more sense than signaling a right turn with your left arm at a 90 degree angle pointing upwards."
While that makes sense, is signaling right turns with the left arm raised at 90° not allowed then? That's the hand signal for driving a car, but I suppose drivers can't be expected to remember stuff they should learned. When I ride my fixed wheel bike, I don't want to signal with my right hand because that's where my hand brake is.
Be that as it may, it's good that a state draws attention to these laws because in most cases nobody, even the police, know traffic laws as they pertain to cyclists.
"As a fellow S.C. transplant I can attest this morning a TUNDRA driver did his best to terminate my existence."
Recall, this is the same S.C. county that refused monies requiring statewide bicycle path construction.
Were not for extra vigilance while riding you would be reading about my demise in the SUN News.
People DO break laws, existing or new, daily here in America!
(Ask any law enforcement official for confirmation.)
Here's another 'hatemail' from the staff at Tulsa World (Oklahoma). Its not as scything as your link but nevertheless it shows a complete indifference to bicyclists as people who share the road with motorists. Sad.
First of all, we need to be aware ourselves that for car drivers, the word "cyclist" means everyone on a bicycle. This includes the totally clueless, the ones who can't be bothered to stop at stop signs or red lights, the ones who dart onto and off the sidewalk for their own convenience, the ones who ride the wrong way on one way streets, the ones who just bought a racing bike and are riding in traffic with no awareness that road bike steering is a lot more sensitive than it was on their old mountain bike in the 1980s, the ones who can never stop for anything suddenly because they willingly ride a bicycle not equipped with brakes, and so on. There isn't a driver on the road who can't recite a long list of such examples from their every day driving at the mere mention of cyclist rights. It makes us all look like a bunch of anarchistic goofs, and make no mistake about, all of us who ride bikes get tarred by the same brush.
Then there is the huge disconnect between what knowledgeable, experienced road cyclists know is safer, and what drivers think cyclists should be doing. Almost without exception, drivers think that bicycles should be hugging the curb, gutter or parked cars, whereas effective cycling-aware cyclists know that for maximum safety, they should be riding a reasonable distance away from these, and that they should be riding as vehicles (which includes lane changing, taking the lane when appropriate, etc.).
This disconnect is probably the single biggest source of shouted abuse and other rage-related driver behaviour against cyclists. Effective cycling isn't very effective if only a few select cyclists know about this concept. Drivers need to be made aware that bicycles are vehicles and that they should not expect cyclists to be riding over sewer grates, roadside debris, broken pavement because cities ignore the edges of roads when they do maintenance.
I'm not even going to take the kids to North Myrtle to buy Black Cats any more. :-)
Let's not forget - this vitriol is directed at laws that make it illegal to throw something at a cyclist. You're not welcome in the Palmetto State. Keep your money.
To heck with you, SC. If that's the way you feel about me when I want to go for a ride, you can have your crappy roads all to yourselves. ...and keep your hammocks, your boiled peanuts, your cheesy musical theaters, your run down strand, and South of the Border. I can make my OWN shrimp and grits, thank you very much.
What strikes me is the referral to cycling as a "special interest group". This perception is the route of the problem. These closed minded zombies obviously can't even think for themselves. The thought of cycling as a viable alternative form of transportation and a way of life has not even occurred to them. It is obvious they feel everyone should live the same destructive existence they are locked into. Assuming many of these commentors are at least semi-educated "intelligent" people it strikes fear into my heart and despair that we are on a one way course of destruction, that the "Western Way" it too ingrained in too many to effect change quick enough to pull out of the downward spiral our culture and environment are in. It's not a wonder when North America has the lowest ridership in the World.