Advertise Here

Join the Registry

If you own a frame or bike built by Dave Moulton, email details to list it on the registry website at www.davemoultonregistry.com 

Email

(Contact Dave)

Dave Moulton

More pictures of my past work can be viewed in the Photo Gallery on the Owner's Registry. A link is in the navigation bar at the top

Bicycle Accident Lawyer

Zero Tolerance for Spam

  I can delete Spam a lot quicker than it can be posted. Comments are checked daily, even on old articles, and any with irrelevant advertising links are deleted. Blatant or persistant Spammers are blocked. 

Dave Moulton

 

 

 

Powered by Squarespace
« I Rode to the Edge of America and Back | Main | 1981 Custom »
Thursday
Apr192007

Would you buy it, strip it, dump the frame?


A Paris Sport tandem that I built in 1980 has been up for sale on SF Craigslist for a few weeks now. The price is right at $1,000 and there maybe several reasons why it hasn’t sold yet.

Craigslist doesn’t have the safeguards that eBay has so you really need to go look at something before you buy. That limits potential buyers to people within driving distance of Sacramento, where the tandem happens to be.

No one buys a bike unless it fits them; here you have a machine that has to fit two people. Therefore limiting potential buyers still further, unless someone buys it first then goes out to find a partner to fit the other half.

I am in no way connected to this sale, but I do happen to believe this sale is genuine. I have previously corresponded with the owners, who are the original owners. I also wrote about this one in a blog (July 2006)

This morning the sale was mentioned here, and I quote from the post: “I reckon someone might want it just for Phil Wood stuff...”



WTF. Has the value of my work sunk so low that someone would suggest buying it just to strip it of a few of the component parts?

Now you can call me over sensitive, or call me an egotistical MF, but when I read something like this, it is like a swift kick in the bollocks.

Reader Comments (8)

I saw that comment, I took it to mean more that very few people are looking for tandems in general, much less "older" used ones that weren't built for them. If it were a single of yours, they'd have to put up roadblocks stem the flood of buyers streaming up from the bay area...
April 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Phil
Some people collect things.
What is the value of Phil Wood parts? A cyclist will talk about how well they work, ease of maintenance, aesthetic appeal. If he has them he is using them.
A collector can tell you the going rate of so-and-so parts, and keeps those parts in a box until he sells them.
I read of a watch collector that travels the world with $1 million of watches in a bag, looking for the next buy. He never wears them.
Used to be we’d collect and trade baseball cards, put them in our bike wheels, and get together to see what the other kids had. Now its people collecting them for the sake of collecting them, the prices went way up, and the market changed so much manufacturers are now rethinking sales.
Your art de jour is fleeting to collectors. Useless unless there’s monetary value.
To a rider, it’s an art object to ride.
Now which is worth more?
April 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter VintageSpin
Never Mind the Bollocks, its...

a fine looking tandem. Considered it for my wife + son or daughter, but even fairly priced, $1000 is not in the cards at the moment. You know how good the frame is, and a silent majority of that slender, bicycle-appreciating minority does too!
April 20, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter BikeFixe
Since I'm the one who applied the boot, let me clarify a bit.

First off, let me apologize for the comment, which came across in a very different way than it was intended. I spoke imprecisely and poorly, and did not mean it to be a backhand at the quality or desireability of Dave's work.

Upon seeing the add, I was stunned that it hadn't sold - even with the issues of tandem-specific difficulties. My thought process (and use the phrase here ironically) was along the lines of "A freakin' Dave Moulton Tandem! When is the last time you saw one of those available? A thousand bucks? That's ridiculously underpriced - you could recoup most of that by selling off the Phil drum brake!"

That's about the time I dashed off the mention to the iBob list, figuring that there were people like me who would know the quality of what was being sold, and that it was being offered at a silly-low price. There are a lot of list members who are also on the tandem list, and hoped they might forward it there as well.

So my point was that you might sell off the Phil stuff - which has a following - but you'd end up with a unique and wonderful frame.

I'm really sorry it came across with the opposite meaning.

All the best,

-- Jim
April 22, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter cyclofiend
Jim,
There was no offence taken on my part; I was showing a certain amount of “mock horror” (for want of a better two words.) Also at the time I wrote it I had not connected you as the fellow blogger, cyclofiend. Your blog is one I check regularly.

I did have an idea of what you meant, but I seized on the opportunity to write about this quite rare tandem, because like you I cannot understand why it hasn’t sold. I have no connection with the sale and I feel I can’t blatantly promote it, but was glad to have to opportunity say something.

In 1983 I built a ‘dave moulton’ frame that I built up with a Campagnolo “Anniversary” Groupo. It was the centerpiece of my display at the Interbike Show that year. It was a really pretty frame with lots of chrome and pearlescent paint.

Two years ago, someone bought it, stripped it of the Campy group, and sold the frame off for next to nothing. Good fortune for the buyer, but the seller obviously had no idea what he had. The memory of that was also on my mind when I wrote the tandem piece.

I think “Vintage Spin” hit it on the head when he said there are people who buy the stuff to ride it, and collectors who buy it as an investment only. In the world of vintage guitars there are people buying them who don’t even play, and a musician who would love to own one can’t afford it.

I should be grateful that this situation hasn’t happened with my bikes yet, and people are still riding them. I guess I shouldn’t be too indignant, even mock indignity.
Dave.
April 22, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Dave Moulton
As the former owner of this Paris-Sport Tandem I am glad to report that the tandem was bought to be ridden by a couple who live in the Sacramento area. They were thrilled to upgrade from their older 1970's vintage tandem to this tandem built by Dave, with what were "state of the art" components back in 1980. It also fits them perfectly. They know what they bought is a bike with a lot of history behind it, as they read this blog before buying. As for us, we still have one much newer tandem in the garage, which gets used regularly.
June 14, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Anonymous
Tanedms rock !!

Tandem Bicycles
June 6, 2008 | Unregistered Commenter Anonymous

My wife and I purchased the Paris-Sport tandem from the gentleman in Grass Valley. When we met him, in the Nevada County Fairgrounds parking lot, we had arranged for him to have pedals that would fit our shoes, and we adjusted the seats. Then he said “follow me”. He rode off, up a road between trees that turned out to be a dead end. I did not have time to question my actions, so I made a U turn with the tandem. He said he had shown the bike to people he would not sell it to, the U turn qualified us.

The Paris- Sport tandem has 3 cm. more room for the stoker, and that is enough, I believe. The prior tandem we rode was a Motobecane mixte-back, built in the '60's: 15 speed, no high gear, no low gear, without hooked rims. We named it the Brick when we started to look to upgrade.

We test rode the Paris-Sport some more, following the prior owner around the area, from pavement to dirt through the trees. After awhile, we took it out on the road, and it worked better on the test ride than it would for months. The seller said after he received the check, “I might as well give you this”, and handed me a plastic bucket with a Zipper fairing in it. We have not used that yet, but we will this coming summer.

I did not know the story of the Phil disk brake, and when I asked questions in a bike shop, the answer was “oh, that”. Then a web search educated me on the catastrophic failures the brake caused. We stopped using the brake, and I started the arduous task of fitting an Aria disk to the Phil hub. There is no clearance, and I cut off locater shaft, and a portion of the backing plate to get the brake to fit. When I “blue-printed” the brake, I finally got it to not drag. The gearing was way high (54 x 11, with a large cog of 24). We live in El Dorado County, where there is no easy riding. The bike is re-geared, though I will put the 54 back on in the spring.

Dave, I am so proud to ride the bike.

December 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterStanley
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.