Watchdogging follow up
Thanks to Fritz for the following comment on my previous post:
“I'm a generally lawful and courteous cyclist, but when was the last time motorists who are just part of traffic was labeled "arrogant"?
And just because other cyclists break the law and are hoodlums, why are you and I the ones who are somehow held accountable? We don't expect motorists to apologize for the idiots among their midst.”
I agree with all you say, but who said life was fair, and that everyone in the world plays fair. Cyclists as a group are a minority in the mindset of an automobile society, and minorities always tend to get the shitty end of the stick.
Any minority group, not just cyclists, are always labeled by the worst behavior of those within that group. In place of cyclist say “Illegal immigrant” and are they not all painted as bad? However, the truth is the majority are good, decent people. It is the way that society justifies the prejudice; this is how bigotry works.
Bigots don’t like minority groups who are different than they are, and they wish they would just go away. By labeling the whole group as bad, they gather like minded people to their cause, in the hope that this minority can somehow be stopped, driven out, or eliminated.
As cyclists we can whine and complain to each other about the unfairness of society’s attitude, but will that change anything or make anyone on the other side, listen to our point of view?
All we can do is ride our bikes, and obey the laws of the road, and try to behave in a civilized manner. We have no control over the way others act twards us, but we do have control over the way we re-act.
We can try to convince some amongst us who have a hostile and arrogant attitude, that this type of behavior may not be in their own and other cyclist’s interest.
If people like myself and other bike bloggers, keep pushing the message in a positive way, maybe in time it will find it’s way into the mainstream media.
Reader Comments (9)
More seriously I do agree with you in terms of sentiment. We can all benefit from behaving sensibly, responsibly and calmly when faced with undue provocation.
When we acknowledge the correct behaviour in others it reinforces that behaviour. We do the same with children. Positive is always better than negative and will always yield the greater result.
When we are abused by the behaviour of others we should do our best to contol our (possibly justifiable) anger. We we see correct behviour we should equally acknowlege it. We should also make our disapproval known to those within our midst who fail to follow this approach as their actions reflect on us all.
Ah, not true! American citizens, anyway, can organize to change the laws. Cyclists, unfortunately, don't have the numbers of motorists, nor do we represent the same scale of economic interest (Ford and GM pay a lot more taxes than Cannondale and Trek), but with all the current excitement about global warming, we do represent a necessary solution for transportation in the urban environment. With the American election looming on the horizon, the time is right for cyclists to organize and demand that our place on the road be respected and protected.
"All we can do is ride our bikes, and obey the laws of the road, and try to behave in a civilized manner."
In his essay titled "The Social and Emotional Aspects of Transportation Cycling", Bruce Mol has a name for this type of riding - "veloquent". I like the term. He discusses in the essay what he means by it and even includes charts and graphs. It may be too much analysis for some but I found it interesting.
Cheers, Gene in Tacoma
LA Times 'Cycling Brawl'