Advertise Here

Join the Registry

If you own a frame or bike built by Dave Moulton, email details to list it on the registry website at www.davemoultonregistry.com 

Email

(Contact Dave)

Dave Moulton

More pictures of my past work can be viewed in the Photo Gallery on the Owner's Registry. A link is in the navigation bar at the top

Bicycle Accident Lawyer

Zero Tolerance for Spam

  I can delete Spam a lot quicker than it can be posted. Comments are checked daily, even on old articles, and any with irrelevant advertising links are deleted. Blatant or persistant Spammers are blocked. 

Dave Moulton

 

 

 

Powered by Squarespace
« History of British Cycle Racing: Part I, The Ban | Main | I have nothing today »
Friday
Oct192007

Cyclists: The Redheaded Stepchild

 

Cyclists have always been society’s “Redheaded Stepchild;” unloved and abused throughout history.

Since the invention of the ordinary, or high-wheeler in the late 1800s, when horse drawn carriages were the transport of the day. It was the wealthy classes who owned carriages, and bicycles scared the horses.

It was not uncommon for a coach driver to lash out at a passing cyclist with his horsewhip, and pedestrians were not above putting a walking stick through a rider’s wheel.

Bicycles were expensive and initially cycling was a sport of the wealthy, but it was a young man’s pastime and even wealthy young men were viewed with disdain by the older generation.

Cycling was initially banned in places in England as being too dangerous. However, being a “rich man’s sport,” the ban was short lived. By 1880 there were 213 established cycling clubs in the UK. Remember, this was before the invention of the “Safety Bicycle” in 1885, and the pneumatic tire in 1888.

With the invention of the “safety” bicycle, and mass production that followed, it really changed the face of the sport, and people’s attitude to it. Cycling became affordable to the working classes and it quickly became both a pastime and a mode of transport of the masses.

In England the wealthy who lived on large country estates, suddenly found their space invaded on the weekends by the working classes on their bicycles as they ventured outside the cities for the first time to explore the countryside.

Cycling was no longer a pastime for the wealthy, in fact to ride a bicycle was now a definite sign of being lower class. The privileged upper classes looked for new ways to reclaim the highways again; of course, they found it in the form of the automobile. The resentment towards cyclists, by the upper classes, was already established long before the automobile arrived.

The invention of the pneumatic tire meant there was an explosion in the sport of cycle racing. This led to a ban in England of mass start road racing in 1894; a ban that would last until the 1950s.

The result was road racing never developed in the UK as it did in the rest of Europe. In countries like France, Holland, Belgium, and Italy cyclists receive respect and toleration because of the popularity of cycle road racing in those countries. The general public has become used to seeing cyclists racing and training on the highways.

The only competitive events open to British cyclists were track racing, of course limited to those close to a track. A few mass start circuit races in private parks, and individual time trials, which would become the mainstay of British cycling competition.

It is interesting to note that in 1894, as road racing was banned in England as being too dangerous; the first motor race was held on public roads in France. This led to almost ten years of absolute carnage as racecars quickly developed to reach speeds of 100 mph (Without the brakes, steering and road surfaces to match these speeds.) and there was wholesale slaughter of both spectators and drivers.

The attitude of the wealthy was no doubt one of, what were the deaths of a few of the peasant class, as long as they could enjoy their sport? Much the same state of affairs existed in the United States; it was the privileged who initially drove cars. They set the rules of accepted behavior and attitudes, which still exist today.

Is this not still the attitude now? “What is the death or injury of a few, as long as I can drive as fast as I like, and in a manner that suits me?” Of course, no one intends for people to die, but behave in a certain way and the inevitable will happen. And if a cyclist or pedestrian gets hit, no real concern, just the question, “What were they doing on the road anyway?”

When Henry Ford made cars available to the masses, naturally they expected to drive to the same standards set by their wealthy predecessors. All road safety legislation since has been aimed at protecting the person inside the car, with little thought going into the protection of other road users, namely pedestrians and cyclists.

Those of us today exercising our rights by riding our bike on the public highways should not despair. However, we should be realistic and recognize that current attitudes of the general public have been formed over a 100 years, or more, and things will not change overnight. We will remain the redheaded stepchild, and should expect the abuse to last a little longer.


Footnote: My thanks to Bruce Chandler from Tucson, AZ who emailed with a link to TheBikeZone.org.uk that prompted and helped me put this piece together.

Reader Comments (7)

Few can say it any better than you. Yes as a nation we rationalize any and all actions that continue to support a dependency that is out of control.
Jack
October 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Anonymous
one thing i miss about visits to mainland Europe - the bicycle-friendly attitude. i have fond memories of sitting in the Piazza Duomo in Florence, watching the Crit racers spiral dizzyingly past. and the streets were open for pedestrians and non-racers! only cars were shut out.

i love both my cars - but i certainly wish i could leave them at home more often.
October 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter jhota
Don't worry, the cyclists will get the upper hand, as soon as the oil runs out.
October 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Bob J
Great post, Dave!
October 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Panasonic Youth
I have been visiting your blog regularly since finding the link from Kent's Bike Blog.

Interesting food for thought forming a thoughtful trilogy with your posts on cyclist/POB's and cycling in New Zealand. The bikezone link is fascinating. Thanks for posting.

Cheers, Gene from Tacoma, WA
October 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Anonymous
Well said Dave.
October 22, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter lemmiwinks
It's interesting, though, that cycling is still in many ways the pastime of the middle and upper classes. Even around-town bikes are priced in the thousands of dollars these days. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2500754.ece

Meanwhile, the largest group of cyclists in my city is that of poor or working-poor men who use a bike because it's a cheap mode of transportation. Most of the advocacy I see completely ignores this group of riders.

I'd like to see us reach out to our own stepchildren in the cycling community and work with this untapped base of riders who are already convinced by circumstance that cycling is the way to go.

Again, I'm speaking about my own community. Folks may be doing this elsewhere.

Thanks, as always, for the great site!
October 23, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Jason
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.