Christmas through the years

Once again it is Christmas, how quickly the months and years fly by. Looking back, it is hard to believe I have been through 83 Christmas Days and the surrounding holidays.
Most have been good and happy occasions, but no one Christmas stands out as being different or special.
My childhood memories should have been special, and I guess in a way they were as I seem to remember them the most.
From the age of 5 (The earliest Christmas I remember.) to 9 years it was the war years, 1941 to1945, and every Christmas was so much the same that they all blend together.
I had a brother seven years older than me, and we would go out into the woods and find a Christmas tree, bring it home and decorate it. That was fun. My brother would usually climb a large tree and cut the top off, rather than cut down a small one. There were no Christmas Tree Farms, or trees for sale.
My Christmas stocking was one of my knee-high socks that I wore every day, and I could guarantee every year there would be an orange in the toe of that sock. Yes, an orange was a Christmas gift. Oranges did not grow in England, they had to be imported from Spain or some other Mediterranean country. And bananas, I never saw a banana until the war was over, they came from the West Indies or Florida.
In the leg part of my knee-high sock would be a rolled-up coloring book, and there would be a box of crayons or sometimes colored pencils. Sometimes there might be a special edition comic book like a Walt Disney’s Mickey Mouse. Balloons were another thing I never saw until the war was over, all manufacturing went into the war effort, nothing as trivial as balloons were made.
I do remember one year going to a Christmas Party, and Santa came dressed in a red hat and white beard but was wearing a khaki army overcoat. We were told that Santa Claus had joined the Home Guard. The Home Guard was mostly older men, veterans of the First World War. They were issued a uniform and a rifle, and would have been Britain’s last line of defense, had the country been invaded.
I think the reason my childhood Christmas memories are good, was because my expectations were met. Had I expected more and then didn’t get it, I might have been less happy. But why should I expect more? I don’t remember the other kids I went to school with getting more than me.
In later years after the war, in my late teens or twenty’s, I had left home and lived in rented rooms. If I didn’t get invited to someone’s house, Christmas was a boring, waisted day. I had no TV, and all movie theatres and restaurants were closed. Each Christmas since then I do tend to think of those spending Christmas alone.
Later I married and had children of my own, and those Christmases were special of course. Since coming to the USA, half a lifetime ago, it has become a tradition every Christmas I talk on the phone with my daughters, and granddaughters. Now in recent years I have Great Grandchildren too.
I think for me the older I get, the more content I am, and in a way every day is Christmas. It is hard to single out one special day and make it better that the rest. My expectations are always being met.
I have been blessed in my lifetime with the ability to build a few good bicycle frames. The fact that there are some out there that enjoy my past work, for me is the gift that keeps on giving. I could not ask for more, at Christmas or any other time.
I wish you all a joyous Christmas, or whatever it you celebrate at this time of the year.
To Share click "Share Article" below
Is the beauty of a bicycle in the way it rides, or the way it looks?
When I built my first frames in England in the late 1950s, early 1960s, I was trying to build myself a better frame. A typical frame of that era had a very shallow, 71-degree seat angle and a long top tube. This did not suit my small stature of 5’ 6”. (167.64 cm.)
When making a maximum effort, I found myself sliding forward and consequently sitting on the narrow nose of the saddle. The result was it was extremely uncomfortable and had the effect of the saddle being too low.
The answer seemed obvious to me, if this was the natural position my body wanted to adopt, put the saddle where it needed to be to accommodate it. I also looked at the way the bike handled at speed, there was a tendency to wobble on fast descents. Also, the bike tended to feel sluggish when getting out of the saddle sprint, or to climb.
Over the next 10 or 15 years I built several different frames with varying angles, and each frame had extra front forks of various rakes, (Offset.) Some of these experiments improved the bike’s performance, and others made things worse. It was a long, slow learning process.
By the early 1970s I had pretty much got my own frame geometry figured out. But now I was being asked to build frames for other local cyclists. By now the trend in Italy and in England was the build road frames with 75 or even 76-degree head angles. I went against this trend as I had experimented with these angles years before and found it did not work too well. The handling was skittish or squirrely.
73-degree head had been established as the ideal head angle as far back as the 1930s, and it still worked. However, the old idea was to have a very long fork off-set, and zero trail. This is what lead to the speed wobbles of those old bikes. I had found that I ¼ inches (32 mm.) fork rake worked better and finally settled at 1 3/8 inches. (35 mm.)
With feedback from other riders, I found that a 73-seat angle worked fine for the taller riders, but I would gradually steepen the seat angle as the frame got smaller. The top tube was lengthened as the frame got taller, but at a lesser amount that the seat tube. This was offset by a longer handlebar stem on the larger frames. The idea was to always have the front part of the handlebars directly over the front hub. This meant the handling was consistent throughout the range of sizes.
Here was a frame that would fit better and handle better. (See the advert (Left.) from the British Cycling Magazine from 1975.)
Strangely, I have seen few framebuilders or manufacturers advertising their product on the premise that it rides and handles better than their competitors.
I feel proof that my frame design is valid, is the fact that I still have a following 26 years after I built my last frame. Many owners are original owners and will not part with their bike. I regularly receive emails from owners saying their FUSO or other bike I built is their favorite ride.
I was recently asked, “What do I think of the current American builders?” I don’t really know enough to answer that. I only know what I see at NAHBS each year. I see beautiful pieces of art, outstanding paint and metal work, but how do they ride? Or does anyone even care? No one will ever go out and race on such a machine anyway. Race bikes are no longer made of steel.
As far as I can see, the corporations who today build the carbon fiber bikes that are raced, are doing little that is innovative as far as geometry. They still build the basic 73-degree parallel frame that dates to the days when it was easier for a builder to build a lugged steel frame that way.
It is difficult to find a CF fork with a 35 mm. rake anymore. Today frames come out of a mold, angles and geometry could be unlimited. Within UCI rules of course, but even within those rules there is room for change. The UCI will also follow what the manufactures want. Disc brakes was an example of that.