Dave Moulton

More pictures of my past work can be viewed in the Photo Gallery and on my Website. Links are in the navigation bar at the top

bikelaw - bicycle accident lawyers

Zero Tolerance for Spam

  I can delete Spam a lot quicker than it can be posted. Comments are checked daily, even on old articles, and any with irrelevant advertising links are deleted. Blatant or persistant Spammers are blocked. 

Dave Moulton

 

 

Powered by Squarespace
« Tagged Again | Main | My low-tech bicycle computer »
Wednesday
Jul182007

Why didn't I think of this?



You love the monotony of the treadmill but would prefer to be outdoors, then why not have the best of both worlds with this ingenious device.

U-tube link.


Reader Comments (7)

Because you're not THAT crazy! Is Monty Python making a comeback?

How about some practiacal insight on clinchers v. tubulars? Some of my wheels from the 70s are for sewups and I want to put them to use instead of watching them hang in the garage. Suggestions?

Thanks,
Jack
July 18, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Anonymous
Dave, I don't know if that's a totally outlandish idea... or pure genius. My brain hurts from trying to figure it out.
I'm with Tim...my brain hurts. I just keep thinking, when I'm on my treadmill, I don't have to balance on two wheels....I like it that way.
July 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Donna T.
Yeah, those Bicycle Forest people are clever ones!
July 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Fritz
First one to ride no-hands gets a banana!
July 20, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Anonymous
Work to eat.
Eat to live.
Live to walk.
Walk to ride.
Ride to work.
July 26, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Jim G
Bahahahahahahaha.....

Wow.

Um, where do I go to order one? ;o)
J
July 26, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter John

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>